|

| |

Pros & Cons of the Four Top
Producer
Compensation Methods »
Among its many useful functions,
Producer
P&L™ software helps you to objectively compare the economic
impact for each of the four top methods of agent compensation. You can
easily see how each option financially affects your agency and the producer.
With this information, you can then select the
method that works out best for both parties.
Also, below are some non-financial factors for you to consider.
 | STRAIGHT SALARY
Pro. Both parties know, up front, what the producer
will be paid. The producer is assured of a level paycheck for the length of
his employment contract. His salary level can then be adjusted annually, based
on the prior year's production and his potential for the upcoming twelve
months. In our experience, this method has worked well for
partner-producers.
Con. The relationship of compensation-to-production
is measured only once a year. The other three options [below] include
commission -- and establish this key relationship every single day.
|
 |
STRAIGHT COMMISSION
Pro. Unlimited income potential. Employer need only
compensate for sales that are actually made.
Commission levels need to be established for each policy and
account type, both new and renewal. (Producer P&L™ walks you through this
process.) The agency is still responsible
for many sales-related and operating expenses that will be incurred, even if
the agent doesn’t make a single sale. These costs may include ... employment
agency fees, auto expenses, travel, entertainment, telephone, postage,
additional association dues, E&O insurance premiums, and any extra
computer-related costs. There’s also the expense of operating new business
marketing programs.
Con. Few new
inexperienced job candidates are financially able to accept
employment under this compensation option. It is best suited for veteran
agents.
|
 |
DRAW AGAINST COMMISSION
Pro. Agent has a level monthly income, plus unlimited
income potential. Agency makes regular payments to a producer -- not as
salary, but as a draw. A draw is a repayable advance against
future commissions. (Tip: Make sure that your producer employment
contract recognizes this key fact.)
This is a common compensation method for life insurance
agents. Commission levels to be paid to the agent are established for each
policy or account type. They may be similar or identical, to those levels set
for straight commission compensation. The producer's actual earned commissions
are compared against the draw amounts that were paid, usually on an annual
basis. When the commissions exceed the draw -- the agency owes the producer
the difference. The producer owes the agency -- when the draw amounts exceed
commissions earned. (Producer P&L™ walks you through this entire process.)
Con. A producer may actually owe money he cannot pay at
the end of a given year. The agency may also be taking on more risk than it
expects, as there may difficulty in collecting what's owed -- especially if
the agent was terminated or resigns before his draw is fully validated.
However, you may be able to write off uncollectible draws -- if your
producer’s employment contract was properly written. Tip: Always
check with your CPA and attorney for advice in such contractual matters.
|
 |
SALARY PLUS COMMISSION
Pro. Like the Draw against Commission option,
the producer is allowed a level monthly income plus the potential for
unlimited income. And, the salary that he is paid is his to keep, regardless
of the number of sales that he has actually made. This option is to the
agency's advantage, since the monthly income paid to the producer will be a
lower fixed amount than straight salary -- letting the agent make up or exceed
the difference by the actual commissions that he earns.
This approach to agent compensation is very
common in the P&C industry. Commission levels must be set for all policy and
account types, covering new business and renewals. A base salary must also be
set.
(Producer P&L™ walks you through each required step.)
Con. There is an unfortunate tendency to establish too
high a base salary and/or commission
levels, making this method of compensation unprofitable for the agency.
|
|